Inicio
/
Historia
/
Select TWO Arguments Phyllis Schlafly Had Arguirect the ERA. It Would Eliminate All Gender Specificlaws and Protections. It Would Harm

Problemas

Select TWO arguments Phyllis Schlafly had arguirect the ERA. It would eliminate all gender specificlaws and protections. it would harm the traditional family women could be forced to serve in the military it would decrease job opportunities for women

Roztwór

Pilar experto · Tutor durante 3 años
Weryfikacja ekspertów
4.6 (286 Votos)

Respuesta

The two arguments Phyllis Schlafly had against the ERA are: it would harm the traditional family and women could be forced to serve in the military.

Explicación

## Step 1Phyllis Schlafly was a conservative activist known for her opposition to the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). She argued that the ERA would harm the traditional family structure and that women could be forced to serve in the military.## Step 2Schlafly's opposition to the ERA was based on the belief that it would eliminate all gender-specific laws and protections. She argued that the ERA would lead to women being drafted into the military and that it would decrease job opportunities for women.## Step 3Schlafly's opposition to the ERA was not based on the belief that it would eliminate all gender-specific laws and protections. In fact, she argued that the ERA would lead to the elimination of such laws and protections.## Step 4Schlafly's opposition to the ERA was not based on the belief that it would decrease job opportunities for women. In fact, she argued that the ERA would lead to an increase in job opportunities for women.