Read the passage from Two Treatises of Government (1690) by John Locke. This paternal, regal power being by divine right only his, it leaves no room for human prudence, or consent, to place it any where else; for if only one man hath a divine right to the obedience of mankind, no body can claim that obedience, but he that can shew that right; nor can men's consciences, by any other pretence, be obliged to it. And thus, this doctrine cuts up all government by the roots. Which statement best explains an Enlightenment position on the divine right to rule? If only one person has the authority to rule then no one else, even members of government, may have authority, so divine right undermines civil society. If only one person has the authority to rule, there should be no confusion about how to follow the law, so divine right supports the goals of civil society. If only one person has the authority to rule, the people will always eventually conflict with that ruler, so divine right undermines civil society. If only one person has the authority to rule, all of the public servants they appoint will act in good faith, so divine right supports the goals of civil society.

Question

Read the passage from Two Treatises of Government (1690) by John Locke. This paternal, regal power being by divine right only his, it leaves no room for human prudence, or consent, to place it any where else; for if only one man hath a divine right to the obedience of mankind, no body can claim that obedience, but he that can shew that right; nor can men's consciences, by any other pretence, be obliged to it. And thus, this doctrine cuts up all government by the roots. Which statement best explains an Enlightenment position on the divine right to rule? If only one person has the authority to rule then no one else, even members of government, may have authority, so divine right undermines civil society. If only one person has the authority to rule, there should be no confusion about how to follow the law, so divine right supports the goals of civil society. If only one person has the authority to rule, the people will always eventually conflict with that ruler, so divine right undermines civil society. If only one person has the authority to rule, all of the public servants they appoint will act in good faith, so divine right supports the goals of civil society.

Answer 1

The statement that best explains an Enlightenment position on the divine right to rule is:"If only one person has the authority to rule then no one else, even members of government, may have authority, so divine right undermines civil society."This statement reflects the Enlightenment view that the divine right to rule is problematic because it concentrates power in the hands of one person, which can lead to the undermining of civil society and the rights of individuals. The Enlightenment thinkers, such as John Locke, argued that the divine right to rule was an unjustified and dangerous concept that could lead to the abuse of power and the suppression of individual liberties.

Problemas

Roztwór

Respuesta