Problemas
How did the Dred Scott decision impact tensions between the North and the South? It ended the debate over slavery in the territories It pleased abolitionists by limiting the spread of slavery It reduced tensions by allowing states to compromise on slavery It increased sectional tensions by declaring that slavery could exist anywhere
Roztwór
Carlos
élite · Tutor durante 8 años
4.1
(292 Votos)
Respuesta
D. It increased sectional tensions by declaring that slavery could exist anywhere.
Explicación
## Step 1The Dred Scott decision was a landmark ruling by the United States Supreme Court in 1857. The case involved Dred Scott, an enslaved African American man who had lived in the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back to the slave state of Missouri. He sued for his freedom, arguing that living in a free state and territory had made him a free man.## Step 2The Supreme Court ruled against Dred Scott, stating that as a slave, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue in federal court. The court also declared that Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery in the territories, effectively nullifying the Missouri Compromise of 1820.## Step 3This decision had a profound impact on the tensions between the North and the South. The North, where slavery was largely abolished, was outraged by the ruling. They viewed it as a violation of the principles of liberty and equality upon which the nation was founded.## Step 4The South, on the other hand, was pleased with the ruling. They saw it as a validation of their rights to own slaves and a confirmation of their political power.## Step 5The Dred Scott decision increased sectional tensions between the North and the South. It led to the South becoming more assertive in its defense of slavery, while the North became more determined to resist its expansion. This increased tension eventually led to the Civil War.