Problemas
How does the outcome of Worcester v. Georgia relate to judicial review? It has discouraged courts since that time from using the power of judicial review It demonstrated that courts cannot enforce decisions made through judicial review. It affirmed that the courts have the power to review laws but cannot overturn them ) It weakened the courts in reviewing laws and gave the other branches greater power
Roztwór
Zósimo
élite · Tutor durante 8 años
4.6
(185 Votos)
Respuesta
B
Explicación
## Step 1The Worcester v. Georgia case is a significant case in the history of the United States, particularly in the context of judicial review. The case revolved around the sovereignty of Native American tribes and the authority of the federal government over them.## Step 2The Supreme Court, in this case, ruled that the federal government had the power to regulate the interactions between the states and the Native American tribes. This ruling affirmed the power of judicial review, which is the ability of the courts to review and potentially nullify laws that they find to be unconstitutional.## Step 3However, the ruling also demonstrated that courts cannot enforce decisions made through judicial review. This is because the enforcement of such decisions often requires the cooperation of the other branches of government, which may not always be willing or able to comply.## Step 4Therefore, the outcome of Worcester v. Georgia does not discourage courts from using the power of judicial review, nor does it affirm that courts have the power to review laws but cannot overturn them. Instead, it demonstrates that courts cannot enforce decisions made through judicial review.