(A) Moving to the next question prevents changes to this answer. Question 29 As decided in the case presented in the text, Biddel Brothers v.E. Clemens Horst Co., under a C.I.F. sales contract: a. the buyer has no right to inspect the goods and no obligation to pay upon the presentation of the proper documents. b. the buyer has the right to inspect the goods prior to paying for them upon the presentation of the proper documents. C. the buyer has no right to inspect the goods before payment but is obligated to pay upon the presentation of the proper documents. d. the buyer has the right to inspect the goods and no obligation to pay upon the presentation of the proper documents.

Question

(A) Moving to the next question prevents changes to this answer. Question 29 As decided in the case presented in the text, Biddel Brothers v.E. Clemens Horst Co., under a C.I.F. sales contract: a. the buyer has no right to inspect the goods and no obligation to pay upon the presentation of the proper documents. b. the buyer has the right to inspect the goods prior to paying for them upon the presentation of the proper documents. C. the buyer has no right to inspect the goods before payment but is obligated to pay upon the presentation of the proper documents. d. the buyer has the right to inspect the goods and no obligation to pay upon the presentation of the proper documents.

Answer 1

The question is about the interpretation of a C.I.F. (Cost, Insurance, and Freight) sales contract as decided in the case Biddle Brothers v. E. Clemens Horst Co. The options provided are different interpretations of the rights and obligations of the buyer under such a contract. The correct answer is the one that accurately reflects the legal precedent set by the case.

Problemas

Roztwór

Respuesta

Explicación