US.20 A analyze the effects of landmark U 5. Supreme Court decisions, including __ Hernan dez v. Texas But it taxes our credulity to say that mere chance resulted in their [sic] being no members of this class among the over six thousand jurors called in the past 25 years. The result bespeaks discrimination ndez's] only claim is the right to be indicted and tried by juries from which all members of his class are not sy stematically excluded -Juries selected from among all qualified persons regardless of national origin or descent. To this much, he is entitled by the Constitution. -Chief Justice Earl Warren, Hernandez v. Texas, May 31954 14. How did this Supreme Court decision affect judicial interpretations of the Constitution? a. by expanding equal protection rights b. by eliminating due process protections c. by limiting free expression d. by expanding the right of religious freedom

Question

US.20 A analyze the effects of landmark U 5. Supreme Court decisions, including __ Hernan dez v. Texas But it taxes our credulity to say that mere chance resulted in their [sic] being no members of this class among the over six thousand jurors called in the past 25 years. The result bespeaks discrimination ndez's] only claim is the right to be indicted and tried by juries from which all members of his class are not sy stematically excluded -Juries selected from among all qualified persons regardless of national origin or descent. To this much, he is entitled by the Constitution. -Chief Justice Earl Warren, Hernandez v. Texas, May 31954 14. How did this Supreme Court decision affect judicial interpretations of the Constitution? a. by expanding equal protection rights b. by eliminating due process protections c. by limiting free expression d. by expanding the right of religious freedom

Answer 1

a. by expanding equal protection rights

Answer 2

## Step 1The problem is asking us to analyze the effects of the Supreme Court decision in Hernandez v. Texas on judicial interpretations of the Constitution. The excerpt from Chief Justice Earl Warren's opinion in the case suggests that the decision was about the right to be indicted and tried by juries from which all members of a certain class are not systematically excluded. This implies that the decision was about expanding equal protection rights, which is the essence of the Constitution.## Step 2The other options, such as eliminating due process protections, limiting free expression, and expanding the right of religious freedom, do not align with the context of the case. The case is about the right to be indicted and tried by juries from which all members of a certain class are not systematically excluded, which is a matter of equal protection rights.

Problemas

Roztwór

Respuesta

Explicación