What was the holding in El Al Israel Airlines v. Tseng? a. The Warsaw Convention does not apply where the carrier waives its provisions. b. The defendant accepted an additional rate to ship the package based on its declared additional value. c. An international passenger may not bring a cause of action under local law against an airline when there is no bodily injury that satisfies the Warsaw Convention. d. The Warsaw Convention limits the defendant's liability to 9.07 per pound.

Question

What was the holding in El Al Israel Airlines v. Tseng? a. The Warsaw Convention does not apply where the carrier waives its provisions. b. The defendant accepted an additional rate to ship the package based on its declared additional value. c. An international passenger may not bring a cause of action under local law against an airline when there is no bodily injury that satisfies the Warsaw Convention. d. The Warsaw Convention limits the defendant's liability to 9.07 per pound.

Answer 1

The correct answer is:c. An international passenger may not bring a cause of action under local law against an airline when there is no bodily injury that satisfies the Warsaw Convention.In El Al Israel Airlines v. Tseng, the court held that under the Warsaw Convention, an international passenger may not bring a cause of action under local law against an airline when there is no bodily injury that satisfies the Warsaw Convention. The Warsaw Convention only provides compensation for bodily injury, and does not cover property damage or other types of losses. Therefore, the plaintiff's claim for damages to her luggage was not covered by the Warsaw Convention, and she was not entitled to recover any damages under the Convention.

Problemas

Roztwór

Respuesta