Inicio
/
Derecho
/

Problemas

tion 1-27 excerpt below to answer the question lestion in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the lat Congress has a right to prevent tenck v. United States 1918 statement best explains the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in this case? he 1st Amendment was created to protect political speech. Ispeech discussing unpopular topics could be restricted The government could limit speech during times of war The 14th Amendment was created to protect federal power.

Roztwór

Carlos veterano · Tutor durante 9 años
Weryfikacja ekspertów
3.8 (374 Votos)

Respuesta

The statement that best explains the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in this case is: "Speech discussing unpopular topics could be restricted."In the case of Schenck v. United States (1918), the Supreme Court upheld the Espionage Act of 1917, which made it a crime to interfere with the war effort or promote insubordination in the military. The Court ruled that the government could restrict speech if it posed a "clear and present danger" to the nation's security or war effort. This decision established the "clear and present danger" test, which allowed the government to limit speech if it could lead to significant harm or danger.