1. If you were asked to discuss Zimbardo's experiment in light of one of the three major theoretical perspectives, which would you choose? Why? 2. One of Zimbardo's conclusions, not stated in the above ac- count, is that the brutal behavior found in real-life prisons is no due to the antisocial characteristics or personality defects of guards and prisoners Can you argue sociologically, that he is right in this conclusion? How? There was some controversy over the ethics of this experiment Do you think this experiment could be carried out today unde the ASA Code of Ethics? Why or why not?

Question

1. If you were asked to discuss Zimbardo's experiment in light of one of the three major theoretical perspectives, which would you choose? Why? 2. One of Zimbardo's conclusions, not stated in the above ac- count, is that the brutal behavior found in real-life prisons is no due to the antisocial characteristics or personality defects of guards and prisoners Can you argue sociologically, that he is right in this conclusion? How? There was some controversy over the ethics of this experiment Do you think this experiment could be carried out today unde the ASA Code of Ethics? Why or why not?

Answer 1

1. If I were to discuss Zimbardo's experiment in light of one of the three major theoretical perspectives, I would choose the symbolic interactionist perspective. This perspective focuses on the subjective meanings and interpretations that individuals attach to their experiences and interactions. Zimbardo's experiment provides a unique opportunity to examine how the roles and labels assigned to individuals (guards and prisoners) influenced their behavior and interactions. By analyzing the symbolic meanings and social dynamics at play, we can gain a deeper understanding of the powerful impact that social contexts and labels can have on human behavior.2. Zimbardo's conclusion that the brutal behavior found in real-life prisons is not solely due to the antisocial characteristics or personality defects of guards and prisoners can be argued sociologically. The sociological perspective emphasizes the role of social structures, institutions, and power dynamics in shaping human behavior. In the case of prisons, the hierarchical structure and power imbalance between guards and prisoners create an environment that fosters abuse and mistreatment. The social norms and expectations associated with the roles of guards and prisoners also contribute to the perpetuation of such behavior. By examining the broader social context and the influence of power dynamics, we can see that the brutal behavior observed in Zimbardo's experiment is not solely a result of individual personality traits, but rather a reflection of the underlying social and institutional factors.3. The ethics of Zimbardo's experiment have been widely debated, and it is unlikely that such an experiment could be carried out today under the ASA (American Sociological Association) Code of Ethics. The ASA Code of Ethics emphasizes the importance of obtaining informed consent, minimizing harm to participants, and ensuring the overall well-being of participants. Zimbardo's experiment involved deceiving participants about their assigned roles and exposing them to potentially harmful and distressing situations. This raises significant ethical concerns regarding the protection of participants' rights and well-being. Given the potential for psychological and emotional harm, it is unlikely that an experiment of this nature would be approved under the current ethical guidelines set forth by the ASA.

Problemas

Roztwór

Respuesta