10. Provide an example of how the Daubert Standard might be applied in a forensie science case (e.g., DN A evidence, blood spatter analysis).

The Daubert Standard is a rule of evidence regarding the admissibility of expert witnesses' testimony in legal proceedings. It is used to determine whether the testimony is based on scientifically valid reasoning that can be applied to the facts of the case.In a forensic science case, the Daubert Standard might be applied to DNA evidence. For example, if a defendant claims that the DNA evidence presented by the prosecution is flawed, the court would apply the Daubert Standard to determine whether the DNA testing methodology used is scientifically valid and reliable. The court would consider factors such as whether the testing methodology has been peer-reviewed, whether it has been tested and accepted by the scientific community, and whether it has been subject to rigorous standards of testing and validation.If the court determines that the DNA testing methodology is scientifically valid and reliable, the DNA evidence may be admitted as evidence in the case. However, if the court determines that the methodology is not scientifically valid or reliable, the DNA evidence may be excluded from the case.Similarly, the Daubert Standard could be applied to other types of forensic science evidence, such as blood spatter analysis or fingerprint analysis. The court would consider the scientific validity and reliability of the methodology used to analyze the evidence and determine whether it is admissible in court.