Problemas
A. Moving to another question will save this response. Question 1 In Texas, why were primary elections more important than general elections during most of the twentieth century? a. The general election was often fixed. b. In a one-party state the winner of the primary would most likely win the general election. C. The primary election was the only election held in many Texas counties. d. The primary election was,open to more voters than the general election.
Roztwór
Ángel
maestro · Tutor durante 5 años
4
(270 Votos)
Respuesta
'b'
Explicación
## Step 1The question is asking why primary elections were more important than general elections in Texas during most of the twentieth century. The options provided are:a. The general election was often fixed.b. In a one-party state the winner of the primary would most likely win the general election.c. The primary election was the only election held in many Texas counties.d. The primary election was open to more voters than the general election.## Step 2The correct answer is option b, which states that in a one-party state, the winner of the primary would most likely win the general election. This is because in a one-party state, the party with the most power is the only party that can win the election. Therefore, the primary election, which is the election within the party, is the most important because it determines who will represent the party in the general election.## Step 3The other options are not correct because they do not accurately describe the importance of primary elections in a one-party state. Option a suggests that the general election was often fixed, which is not the case. Option c suggests that the primary election was the only election held in many Texas counties, which is also not true. Option d suggests that the primary election was open to more voters than the general election, which is not necessarily true.