Why is it important to distinguish between empirical and normative statements in comparative political research? It ensures all analyses are purely qualitative. It eliminates ambiguity in historical contexts It reduces rellance on subjective data sources It clarifies the objective versus prescriptive aspects of political systems. It helps avoid subjective blases in quantitative analysis

Question

Why is it important to distinguish between empirical and normative statements in comparative political research? It ensures all analyses are purely qualitative. It eliminates ambiguity in historical contexts It reduces rellance on subjective data sources It clarifies the objective versus prescriptive aspects of political systems. It helps avoid subjective blases in quantitative analysis

Answer 1

In comparative political research, distinguishing between empirical and normative statements is crucial because it clarifies the objective versus prescriptive aspects of political systems. - **Empirical statements** are based on observable and verifiable evidence. They describe how things are, focusing on facts and data. - **Normative statements** involve value judgments and prescribe how things should be, often reflecting opinions or beliefs.By differentiating these two types of statements, researchers can clearly separate factual analysis from value-laden interpretations, ensuring that their studies are grounded in objective data while acknowledging any subjective perspectives. This distinction helps maintain clarity and rigor in political analysis and avoids conflating descriptive observations with prescriptive recommendations.

Problemas

Roztwór

Respuesta