The excerpt below is from Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes' opinion in Schenck v. United States (1919). The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. ased on the excerpt, with which statement would Oliver Wendell Holmes have greed? A. Freedom of speech is not absolute. B. Prayer in public schools is unconstitutional. C. Immigration from other countries cannot be permitted during wartime. D. Criticism of the policies of allied countries must be temporarily prohibited in wartime

Question

The excerpt below is from Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes' opinion in Schenck v. United States (1919). The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. ased on the excerpt, with which statement would Oliver Wendell Holmes have greed? A. Freedom of speech is not absolute. B. Prayer in public schools is unconstitutional. C. Immigration from other countries cannot be permitted during wartime. D. Criticism of the policies of allied countries must be temporarily prohibited in wartime

Answer 1

La respuesta correcta es la opción A: "La libertad de expresión no es absoluta". En el extracto, Holmes menciona que la pregunta en cada caso es si las palabras utilizadas crean un peligro claro y presente que llevará a los males sustanciales que el Congreso tiene derecho a prevenir. Esto implica que la libertad de expresión puede ser limitada si las palabras utilizadas crean un peligro claro y presente.

Problemas

Roztwór

Respuesta