As a banker in the days after WWIl Franz did his best to help his closest friends wire money to foreign banks before the Allies were able to trace their origin. Franz had not ever been to a Nazi concentration camp, but he did understand that his friends' wealth had been amassed during the time when German Jews were being divested of their businesses. Franz was helpful in connecting some of his friends with art dealers who might be interested in paintings they acquired when they moved into properties left by Jews. If Franz were to be prosecuted as part of an international tribunal today, on what count would he MOST likely be found guilty? acts of genocide public incitement to genocide complicity in genocide acts leading to genocide

Question

As a banker in the days after WWIl Franz did his best to help his closest friends wire money to foreign banks before the Allies were able to trace their origin. Franz had not ever been to a Nazi concentration camp, but he did understand that his friends' wealth had been amassed during the time when German Jews were being divested of their businesses. Franz was helpful in connecting some of his friends with art dealers who might be interested in paintings they acquired when they moved into properties left by Jews. If Franz were to be prosecuted as part of an international tribunal today, on what count would he MOST likely be found guilty? acts of genocide public incitement to genocide complicity in genocide acts leading to genocide

Answer 1

Based on the scenario described, Franz would most likely be found guilty of "complicity in genocide." This charge involves assisting or facilitating actions that contribute to the commission of genocide, even if the individual did not directly participate in the genocidal acts themselves. By helping his friends wire money and connect with art dealers for assets acquired from Jews during the Holocaust, Franz was complicit in benefiting from and perpetuating the consequences of genocidal actions.

Problemas

Roztwór

Respuesta