Problemas
The following passage from pGragraph 3 mainly shows that __ They shouted; played, fought cried, laughed, hastening with all the obscure avidity of being to tear out pieces of living flesh with their teeth and nails, displaying that common and ancestral defmentia which slumbers within every healthy biological specimen and which is the normal nourishment, appropriate to the practical and animal development of the "principal of action." A. Dali was very critical of his classmates'wild and reckless behavior and judged them for being no better than animals D B. Dali couldn't understand what was wrong with the other children C. Dali recognized that the other children were behaving in a "normal"fashion but that "normal"behavior was entirely opposite to his own nature D. there was clearly something very wrong with Dalí who didn't exhibit the traits of normal child development
Roztwór
Luciana
professionell · Tutor durante 6 años
4.1
(266 Votos)
Respuesta
The correct answer is 'C'.
Explicación
## Step 1The first step in solving this problem is to understand the context of the passage. The passage describes a scene where children are behaving in a wild and reckless manner, tearing out pieces of living flesh with their teeth and nails. This behavior is described as a common and ancestral dementia, which is the normal nourishment for the practical and animal development of the "principal of action."## Step 2Next, we need to analyze each of the given options in light of the passage. ## Step 3Option A suggests that Dali was critical of his classmates' behavior. However, the passage does not provide any evidence that Dali was critical of his classmates.## Step 4Option B suggests that Dali couldn't understand what was wrong with the other children. Again, the passage does not provide any evidence that Dali was confused about the children's behavior.## Step 5Option C suggests that Dali recognized that the other children were behaving in a "normal" fashion, but that this "normal" behavior was entirely opposite to his own nature. This option seems to align with the passage, as it describes the children's behavior as a common and ancestral dementia, which is the normal nourishment for the practical and animal development of the "principal of action."## Step 6Option D suggests that there was something very wrong with Dali who didn't exhibit the traits of normal child development. However, the passage does not provide any evidence that Dali was abnormal.