What is most likely the speaker's reason for including the following series of questions (paragraph 9)? Would you have me argue that man is entitled to liberty? That he is the rightful owner of his own body? You have already declared it. Must I argue the wrongfulness of slavery?Is that a question for Republicans? Is it to be settled by the rules of logic and argumentation, as a matter beset with great difficulty, involving a doubtful application of the principle of justice, hard to be understood? How should I look to-day, in the presence of Americans, dividing, and subdividing a discourse, to show that men have a natural right to freedom?Speaking of it relatively and positively, negatively and affirmatively. To do so, would be to make myself ridiculous and to offer an insult to your understanding There is not a man beneath the canopy of heaven that does not know that slavery is wrong for him. A. To show that Republicans are not to be taken seriously Incorred. There is no evidence to support this answer. B. To insist that arguing the wrongfulness of slavery ridicules the person arguing and insults the listener Correct He thinks that the wrongfulness of slavery is someone everyone inherently understands C. To suggest that logic and argumentation are the strongest weapons against slavery Incorrect. There is no evidence to support this answer. D To show he has a great sense of humor Incorrect. There is no evidence to support this arrywet

Question

What is most likely the speaker's reason for including the following series of questions (paragraph 9)? Would you have me argue that man is entitled to liberty? That he is the rightful owner of his own body? You have already declared it. Must I argue the wrongfulness of slavery?Is that a question for Republicans? Is it to be settled by the rules of logic and argumentation, as a matter beset with great difficulty, involving a doubtful application of the principle of justice, hard to be understood? How should I look to-day, in the presence of Americans, dividing, and subdividing a discourse, to show that men have a natural right to freedom?Speaking of it relatively and positively, negatively and affirmatively. To do so, would be to make myself ridiculous and to offer an insult to your understanding There is not a man beneath the canopy of heaven that does not know that slavery is wrong for him. A. To show that Republicans are not to be taken seriously Incorred. There is no evidence to support this answer. B. To insist that arguing the wrongfulness of slavery ridicules the person arguing and insults the listener Correct He thinks that the wrongfulness of slavery is someone everyone inherently understands C. To suggest that logic and argumentation are the strongest weapons against slavery Incorrect. There is no evidence to support this answer. D To show he has a great sense of humor Incorrect. There is no evidence to support this arrywet

Answer 1

## Step 1The speaker in the given paragraph is expressing his thoughts on the topic of slavery. He is questioning the need to argue about the wrongfulness of slavery, stating that it is a universally understood concept. ## Step 2The speaker also mentions that arguing about the wrongfulness of slavery would be ridiculous and insulting to the listener's understanding. This suggests that he believes the wrongfulness of slavery is a concept that everyone inherently understands.## Step 3Based on the speaker's statements, we can infer that the speaker's reason for including this series of questions is to insist that arguing the wrongfulness of slavery ridicules the person arguing and insults the listener. This aligns with option B.

Problemas

Roztwór

Respuesta

Explicación