Problemas
7. Using Source 2, which statement best explains how the ideas expressed in the Roosevelt Corollary reflected U.S. actions in Panama shown in Source 1? A. The Roosevelt Corollary encouraged the creation of new U.S. colonies in Central America. B. The Roosevelt Corollary endorsed Colombia's refusal to ratify the Hay-Herrá Treaty C. The Roosevelt Corollary supported U.S. involvement in the Western Hemisphere to benefit U.S. strategic interests. D. The Roosevelt Corollary advocated for cooperatior between the United States and Europe to resolve disputes in Central America.
Roztwór
Eileen
maestro · Tutor durante 5 años
4.2
(264 Votos)
Respuesta
C
Explicación
The Roosevelt Corollary was an addition to the Monroe Doctrine articulated by President Theodore Roosevelt in his State of the Union address in 1904. The Monroe Doctrine, established in 1823, was a policy of the United States that opposed European colonialism in the Americas. The Roosevelt Corollary expanded upon this doctrine by stating that the United States would intervene in conflicts between European and Latin American countries to enforce legitimate claims of the European powers, rather than having the Europeans press their claims directly.In the context of the question, Source 2 refers to the Roosevelt Corollary, and Source 1 refers to U.S. actions in Panama. The U.S. involvement in Panama is a classic example of the Roosevelt Corollary in action. The U.S. supported Panama's independence from Colombia and subsequently signed the Hay-Bunau-Varilla Treaty, which granted the U.S. control over the Panama Canal Zone.Option A is incorrect because the Roosevelt Corollary did not encourage the creation of new U.S. colonies in Central America. It was more about preventing European intervention in the Americas.Option B is incorrect because the Roosevelt Corollary did not endorse Colombia's refusal to ratify the Hay-Herrán Treaty. The Hay-Herrán Treaty was an agreement between the U.S. and Colombia (which controlled Panama at the time) that would have granted the U.S. control over the Panama Canal Zone. However, the treaty was rejected by the Colombian Senate, leading to the support of Panamanian independence by the U.S.Option C is correct because the Roosevelt Corollary supported U.S. involvement in the Western Hemisphere to benefit U.S. strategic interests. The U.S. involvement in Panama was to secure control over the Panama Canal, which was of significant strategic and economic interest to the U.S.Option D is incorrect because the Roosevelt Corollary did not advocate for cooperation between the United States and Europe to resolve disputes in Central America. It was more about asserting U.S. dominance in the region to prevent European intervention.Therefore, the statement that best explains how the ideas expressed in the Roosevelt Corollary reflected U.S. actions in Panama shown in Source 1 is that the Roosevelt Corollary supported U.S. involvement in the Western Hemisphere to benefit U.S. strategic interests.