Imagine that Shelia is writing a persuasive essay.During her research she finds evidence that supports her claim in her thesis. She also finds data that goes contrary to her claim During her writing, she decides not to use the data that reveals a fuller picture about the topic and instead only uses the data that supports her claim. Which type of logical fallacy is described here? Cherry picking Post hoc fallacy Reversing causal direction Correlation proves causation

## Step 1<br />The problem presents a scenario where Shelia is writing a persuasive essay. She finds evidence that supports her claim and also evidence that contradicts her claim. However, she decides to only use the evidence that supports her claim and ignores the evidence that contradicts it.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />This situation is a classic example of a logical fallacy, which is a flaw in reasoning that makes an argument invalid this case, Shelia is selectively choosing evidence that supports her claim and ignoring evidence that contradicts it.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />This type of logical fallacy is known as "Cherry picking". Cherry picking is a fallacy where only a selection of data is presented not necessarily representative of the whole real situation, in order to deceive or mislead.