Read the following claim from paragraph 1 of the passage. -In the United States.freedom of speech is protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution There have always bee limits to this freedom." Which evidence would be the most credible to support this claim? Statistics about limits on free speech from a protest flyer circulated at a university. Aquote from a website that advocates ending all limits to free speech. The text of an eighteenth century law that limits people's right to speak out against the government. A journal entry from 1798 that complains about a friend's imprisonment based on anti-government speech.

## Step 1<br />The problem asks us to identify the most credible evidence to support the claim that there have always been limits to freedom of speech in the United States. The options provided are:<br />- Statistics about limits on free speech from a protest flyer circulated at a university.<br />- A quote from a website that advocates ending all limits to free speech.<br />- The text of an eighteenth century law that limits people's right to speak out against the government.<br />- A journal entry from 1798 that complains about a friend's imprisonment based on anti-government speech.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />We need to evaluate each option based on its credibility and relevance to the claim.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The first option, statistics about limits on free speech from a protest flyer circulated at a university, may not be credible because it is based on a specific event and may not represent the general situation.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />The second option, a quote from a website that advocates ending all limits to free speech, is not credible because it is based on a personal opinion and not on factual evidence.<br /><br />## Step 5<br />The third option, the text of an eighteenth century law that limits people's right to speak out against the government, is credible because it is a primary source that directly addresses the claim.<br /><br />## Step 6<br />The fourth option, a journal entry from 1798 that complains about a friend's imprisonment based on anti-government speech, is not credible because it is based on a personal experience and not on factual evidence.