in pea plants, yellow seeds (T) are dominant to other seed colors A cross of two yellow see seerfs. A scientist concludes that the parent plants both have the gumorypes TT Which statement best explains the flaw in the scientist's conclusion? A. There is not enough data because seed color is a codominant trait. B. There is not enough data because the same results would oc(if) if parents were it Xill C. There is not enough data because the same results would occurif parents were T1times T2 Mot enough data because the same results would occur it parents were TIXTT

The question is about Mendelian genetics, specifically the concept of dominance in traits. In this case, the trait is seed color in pea plants, where yellow seeds (T) are dominant over other colors. The scientist's conclusion that both parent plants have the genotype TT is based on the assumption that all offspring will have yellow seeds. However, this conclusion is flawed because it does not consider other possible genotypes that could result in yellow seeds. For example, if one parent has the genotype TT and the other has the genotype Tt, the offspring could still have yellow seeds, but the scientist's conclusion would be incorrect. Therefore, the statement that best explains the flaw in the scientist's conclusion is that there is not enough data because the same results would occur if parents were TT x TT.