Why are warrants NOT required to investigate a fire scene? It's not known until later whether a crime was committed. It's important to know where a fire started and if it could flare up again. Firefighters are already on the scene, so a warrant would be meaningless. Warrants are required to investigate a fire scene.

## Step 1<br />The question is asking why warrants are not required to investigate a fire scene. This is a legal question, and the answer depends on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the investigation.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />In general, warrants are not required to investigate a fire scene because the primary concern is public safety. Firefighters are already on the scene, and their primary responsibility is to ensure the safety of the public and to extinguish the fire.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The other options provided in the question are not accurate. It is not true that it's not known until later whether a crime was committed. The determination of whether a crime has been committed is made based on the evidence found at the scene.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />The statement that it's important to know where a fire started and if it could flare up again is true, but it does not explain why warrants are not required.<br /><br />## Step 5<br />The statement that warrants are required to investigate a fire scene is also not accurate. While warrants may be required in certain circumstances, such as when there is a suspicion of arson or other criminal activity, they are not always required.