Pagina de inicio
/
Derecho
/
In the 2015 case Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans,InC. the Supreme Court decided that the State of Texas was not required to offer license plates featuring the Confederate flag. What does this case indicate about First Amendment rights in the 21st century? A. Courts continue to find that First Amendment rights are not absolute. B. The First Amendment is primarily protected by courts at the state level. C. The First Amendment continues to be interpreted through such means as the Lemon test. D. Limitations to protect the public interest are no longer placed on First Amendment rights. 0

Problemas

In the 2015 case Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans,InC. the Supreme Court decided that the State of Texas was not required to offer license plates featuring the Confederate flag. What does this case indicate about First Amendment rights in the 21st century? A. Courts continue to find that First Amendment rights are not absolute. B. The First Amendment is primarily protected by courts at the state level. C. The First Amendment continues to be interpreted through such means as the Lemon test. D. Limitations to protect the public interest are no longer placed on First Amendment rights. 0

In the 2015 case Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans,InC. the Supreme Court decided that the State of Texas was not required to offer license plates featuring the Confederate flag. What does this case indicate about First Amendment rights in the 21st century? A. Courts continue to find that First Amendment rights are not absolute. B. The First Amendment is primarily protected by courts at the state level. C. The First Amendment continues to be interpreted through such means as the Lemon test. D. Limitations to protect the public interest are no longer placed on First Amendment rights. 0

Solución

avatar
Luisprofessionell · Tutor durante 6 años
expert verifiedVerificación de expertos
4.1 (331 votos)

Responder

. Courts continue to find that First Amendment rights are not absolute.<br /><br />This case indicates that the government can exercise discretion in certain contexts, such as specialty license plates, without violating the First Amendment. The decision reflects the principle that First Amendment rights have limitations and are not absolute, especially when it comes to government speech.
Haz clic para calificar: