Pagina de inicio
/
Tecnología
/
Consider this claim: Wikis, or websites that allow users to generate and alter content, are not reliable sources for academic research. Which is the strongest evidence to support the claim? Many wikis allow anyone, not just subject-matter experts, to post information on their sites. Henry King, a political science professor, forbids his students from citing wikis as sources in any of their research papers. Wikis are not print resources; they are only offered online.

Problemas

Consider this claim:
Wikis, or websites that allow users to generate and alter content, are not reliable sources
for academic research.
Which is the strongest evidence to support the claim?
Many wikis allow anyone, not just subject-matter experts, to post information
on their sites.
Henry King, a political science professor, forbids his students from citing wikis
as sources in any of their research papers.
Wikis are not print resources; they are only offered online.

Consider this claim: Wikis, or websites that allow users to generate and alter content, are not reliable sources for academic research. Which is the strongest evidence to support the claim? Many wikis allow anyone, not just subject-matter experts, to post information on their sites. Henry King, a political science professor, forbids his students from citing wikis as sources in any of their research papers. Wikis are not print resources; they are only offered online.

Solución

avatar
Vicentemaestro · Tutor durante 5 años
expert verifiedVerificación de expertos
3.7 (226 votos)

Responder

The strongest evidence to support the claim that wikis are not reliable sources for academic research is:<br /><br />**Many wikis allow anyone, not just subject-matter experts, to post information on their sites.**<br /><br />This point highlights the lack of expert oversight and the potential for inaccuracies or biased information, which undermines the reliability of wikis for academic purposes.
Haz clic para calificar: