Pagina de inicio
/
Historia
/
Why did critics of Andrew Jackson refer to him as "King Andrew"? He favored policies that supported the monarchy in Europe. He was seen as overstepping his constitutional limits particularly with the veto power. He promoted nepotism by appointing family members to key positions. He openly declared his intention to increase executive power.

Problemas

Why did critics of Andrew Jackson refer to him as "King Andrew"?
He favored policies that supported the monarchy in Europe.
He was seen as overstepping his constitutional limits particularly with the veto power.
He promoted nepotism by appointing family members to key positions.
He openly declared his intention to increase executive power.

Why did critics of Andrew Jackson refer to him as "King Andrew"? He favored policies that supported the monarchy in Europe. He was seen as overstepping his constitutional limits particularly with the veto power. He promoted nepotism by appointing family members to key positions. He openly declared his intention to increase executive power.

Solución

avatar
Olgaprofessionell · Tutor durante 6 años
expert verifiedVerificación de expertos
4.0 (170 votos)

Responder

B

Explicar

The question is asking why critics of Andrew Jackson, the seventh President of the United States, referred to him as "King Andrew". The options provided are:<br /><br />1. He favored policies that supported the monarchy in Europe.<br />2. He was seen as overstepping his constitutional limits particularly with the veto power.<br />3. He promoted nepotism by appointing family members to key positions.<br />4. He openly declared his intention to increase executive power.<br /><br />To answer this question, we need to consider the historical context and the actions of Andrew Jackson during his presidency. Andrew Jackson served as President from 1829 to 1837. He was known for his strong leadership style and his use of the presidential veto, which some critics felt was an overreach of executive power. This led to the moniker "King Andrew", implying that he was acting more like a monarch than a president within the bounds of the U.S. Constitution.<br /><br />Option 1 is incorrect because Andrew Jackson did not favor policies that supported the monarchy in Europe. He was, in fact, a strong advocate for American nationalism and was opposed to any form of foreign influence in the United States.<br /><br />Option 3 is also incorrect. While it is true that Jackson appointed his friends and supporters to government positions, this was not the primary reason he was referred to as "King Andrew".<br /><br />Option 4 is not accurate. Jackson did not openly declare his intention to increase executive power. His use of the veto was seen as an overreach by some, but he did not openly declare such intentions.<br /><br />Therefore, the correct answer is Option 2. Jackson was seen as overstepping his constitutional limits, particularly with his use of the veto power, which led to the nickname "King Andrew".
Haz clic para calificar: