Women's rights have historically been restricted by the Supreme Court's use of which of the following? strict scrutiny Jim Crow laws the separate-but-equal doctrine the reasonableness standard

## Step 1<br />The problem is asking us to identify which legal principle or doctrine has historically been used by the Supreme Court to restrict women's rights. The options provided are strict scrutiny, Jim Crow laws, the separate-but-equal doctrine, and the reasonableness standard.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The separate-but-equal doctrine is a legal principle that allows for racial segregation as long as the separate facilities are equal in quality. This doctrine was established in the 1896 Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The separate-but-equal doctrine was later applied to women's rights in the 1972 Supreme Court case Eisenstadt v. Baird. In this case, the Supreme Court upheld a Massachusetts law that required unmarried people to use contraceptives in private, not public, places. This was seen as a violation of the right to privacy, which was established in the 1965 case Griswold v. Connecticut.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />The separate-but-equal doctrine was used to justify the restriction of women's rights in this case, as it allowed for the segregation of women's rights from men's rights as long as the separate facilities (in this case, the private and public use of contraceptives) were equal in quality.