The Supreme Court is ruling on the question 2 of 5 appeal of a man who has robbed a bank and injured several people. The Oklahoma Federal Court previously sentenced him to death because several people were left with long -term injuries, and he is refusing to tell them where he hid the money. Why is this an example of appellate jurisdiction? Because the relevance of the topic is that important Because the Supreme Court legally has to hear any case where the death penalty was used as a punishment Because they are reviewing the facts of the case to find whether cooperation is required by the Constitution Because the Supreme Court is reviewing a case which has already been considered by a lower level court

## Step 1<br />The problem is about understanding the concept of appellate jurisdiction. Appellate jurisdiction refers to the power of a higher court to review, amend, and overrule decisions of a lower court. This is a fundamental principle in the legal system, allowing for the correction of errors and ensuring that justice is served.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />In this case, the Supreme Court is reviewing the case of a man who has been sentenced to death by the Oklahoma Federal Court. The man has been accused of robbing a bank and injuring several people. The Supreme Court is reviewing this case because it has already been considered by a lower court, the Oklahoma Federal Court.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The Supreme Court is not reviewing this case because of the relevance of the topic, because they legally have to hear any case where the death penalty was used as a punishment, or because they are reviewing the facts of the case to find whether cooperation is required by the Constitution. The Supreme Court is reviewing this case because it has already been considered by a lower court, which is the definition of appellate jurisdiction.