Why is it importan to distinguish between empirical and normative statements in comparative polical research? It ensures all analyses are purely qualitative. It ellminstes ambiguity in historical contexts. It reduces rellance on subjective data sources. It clarifles the objective versus prescriptive aspects of political systems. It helps avoid subjective blases in quantitative analysis.

It clarifies the objective versus prescriptive aspects of political systems.<br /><br />Distinguishing between empirical and normative statements is crucial in comparative political research because it helps clarify what is being observed (empirical) versus what ought to be (normative). Empirical statements are based on observable and measurable evidence, while normative statements involve value judgments and prescriptions. By making this distinction, researchers can ensure that their analyses are grounded in objective data and avoid conflating facts with opinions or values. This clarity is essential for rigorous and unbiased political analysis.