Pagina de inicio
/
Derecho
/
This question requires you to compare a Supreme Court case you studied In class with one you have not studied in class A summary of the Supreme Court case you did not study In class is presented below and provides all of the Information you need to know about this case to answer the prompts. Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940) Newton Cantwell and his sons, who were Jehovah's Witnesses, went door-to door in a New Haven, Connecticut,neighborhood to distribute pamphlets about their religion and encouraged people to join their church. The men did not have a permit to solicit door-to-door. A Connecticut state court convicted the Cantwells of violating an ordinance that stated"lolo person shall solicit money, services, subscriptions or any valuable thing for any alleged religious charitable or philanthropic cause. - unless such cause shall have been approved by the secretary of the public welfare council! Cantwell and his sons challenged the conviction, arguing that they did not need to obtain a permit because their activities were protected by the United States Constitution. The Connecticut Supreme Court upheld the conviction, finding that the statute was in the public interest and that it protected against fraud. The Cantwells appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a unanimous decision the Supreme Court ruled in the Cantwells' favor holding that the United States Constitution prohibited states from making laws like the one in question in New Haven. The Court reasoned that the First Amendment gives citizens the right to believe, as well as the right to act on those beliefs,and regarding the right to act, laws may not deny or limit the right to preach or disseminate religious views. (1) Mark for Review Based on the information respond to the following questions. A. Identify the First Amendment clause that is common to both Wisconsinv. Yoder (1972) and Cantwellv. Connecticut (1940) B. Explain how the facts in Wisconsinv.Yoderand Cannvelly. Connecticarresulted in the Supreme Court issuing similar holdings in both cases. C Explain how the facts of Cantwelly. Connecticurillustrate the Court's need to balance government power and the rights of citizens

Problemas

This question requires you to compare a Supreme Court case you studied In class with one you have not studied in class A summary of the Supreme Court case you did not study In class is presented below and provides all of the Information you need to know about this case to answer the prompts. Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940) Newton Cantwell and his sons, who were Jehovah's Witnesses, went door-to door in a New Haven, Connecticut,neighborhood to distribute pamphlets about their religion and encouraged people to join their church. The men did not have a permit to solicit door-to-door. A Connecticut state court convicted the Cantwells of violating an ordinance that stated"lolo person shall solicit money, services, subscriptions or any valuable thing for any alleged religious charitable or philanthropic cause. - unless such cause shall have been approved by the secretary of the public welfare council! Cantwell and his sons challenged the conviction, arguing that they did not need to obtain a permit because their activities were protected by the United States Constitution. The Connecticut Supreme Court upheld the conviction, finding that the statute was in the public interest and that it protected against fraud. The Cantwells appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a unanimous decision the Supreme Court ruled in the Cantwells' favor holding that the United States Constitution prohibited states from making laws like the one in question in New Haven. The Court reasoned that the First Amendment gives citizens the right to believe, as well as the right to act on those beliefs,and regarding the right to act, laws may not deny or limit the right to preach or disseminate religious views. (1) Mark for Review Based on the information respond to the following questions. A. Identify the First Amendment clause that is common to both Wisconsinv. Yoder (1972) and Cantwellv. Connecticut (1940) B. Explain how the facts in Wisconsinv.Yoderand Cannvelly. Connecticarresulted in the Supreme Court issuing similar holdings in both cases. C Explain how the facts of Cantwelly. Connecticurillustrate the Court's need to balance government power and the rights of citizens

This question requires you to compare a Supreme Court case you studied In class with one you have not studied in class A summary of the Supreme Court case you did not study In class is presented below and provides all of the Information you need to know about this case to answer the prompts. Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940) Newton Cantwell and his sons, who were Jehovah's Witnesses, went door-to door in a New Haven, Connecticut,neighborhood to distribute pamphlets about their religion and encouraged people to join their church. The men did not have a permit to solicit door-to-door. A Connecticut state court convicted the Cantwells of violating an ordinance that stated"lolo person shall solicit money, services, subscriptions or any valuable thing for any alleged religious charitable or philanthropic cause. - unless such cause shall have been approved by the secretary of the public welfare council! Cantwell and his sons challenged the conviction, arguing that they did not need to obtain a permit because their activities were protected by the United States Constitution. The Connecticut Supreme Court upheld the conviction, finding that the statute was in the public interest and that it protected against fraud. The Cantwells appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a unanimous decision the Supreme Court ruled in the Cantwells' favor holding that the United States Constitution prohibited states from making laws like the one in question in New Haven. The Court reasoned that the First Amendment gives citizens the right to believe, as well as the right to act on those beliefs,and regarding the right to act, laws may not deny or limit the right to preach or disseminate religious views. (1) Mark for Review Based on the information respond to the following questions. A. Identify the First Amendment clause that is common to both Wisconsinv. Yoder (1972) and Cantwellv. Connecticut (1940) B. Explain how the facts in Wisconsinv.Yoderand Cannvelly. Connecticarresulted in the Supreme Court issuing similar holdings in both cases. C Explain how the facts of Cantwelly. Connecticurillustrate the Court's need to balance government power and the rights of citizens

Solución

avatar
Patriciamaestro · Tutor durante 5 años
expert verifiedVerificación de expertos
4.7 (286 votos)

Responder

A. The First Amendment clause common to both Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) and Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940) is the freedom of religion clause.<br />B. The facts in Wisconsin v. Yoder and Cantwell v. Connecticut resulted in the Supreme Court issuing similar holdings in both cases because in both cases, the Supreme Court upheld the right of individuals to exercise their freedom of religion. In Wisconsin v. Yoder, the Court upheld the right of Amish parents to withdraw their children from high school, while in Cantwell v. Connecticut, the Court ruled that the state could not prohibit door-to-door religious solicitation without a permit.<br />C. The facts of Cantwell v. Connecticut illustrate the Court's need to balance government power and the rights of citizens by showing the need for the Court to balance the government's power to regulate certain activities for the public good with the rights of citizens to freely exercise their religion.

Explicar

## Step 1<br />The first part of the question asks us to identify the First Amendment clause that is common to both Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) and Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940). The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the freedom of religion, which includes the right to believe and act on those beliefs.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The second part of the question asks us to explain how the facts in Wisconsin v. Yoder and Cantwell v. Connecticut resulted in the Supreme Court issuing similar holdings in both cases. In both cases, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the individuals who were exercising their right to freedom of religion. In Wisconsin v. Yoder, the Court upheld the right of Amish parents to withdraw their children from high school, while in Cantwell v. Connecticut, the Court ruled that the state could not prohibit door-to-door religious solicitation without a permit.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The third part of the question asks us to explain how the facts of Cantwell v. Connecticut illustrate the Court's need to balance government power and the rights of citizens. The case of Cantwell v. Connecticut shows the need for the Court to balance the government's power to regulate certain activities for the public good with the rights of citizens to freely exercise their religion.
Haz clic para calificar: