Pagina de inicio
/
Ciencias Sociales
/
from Civil Disobedience After all, the practical reason why, when the power is once in the hands of the people, a majority are permitted and for a long period continue, to rule is not because they are most likely to be in the right, nor because this seems fairest to the minority, but because they are physically the strongest. But a government in which the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice, even as far as men understand It. Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience?-In which majorities decide only those questions to which the rule of expediency is applicable? Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator?Why has every man a conscience, then? I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterward. It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law,so much as for the right. The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think right. Henry Devid Thoreas) What is the effect of the oxymoron "Civil Disobedience"? 1. It describes a principle:civilians must use legal action to disobey the will of the majority. 2. It establishes a tone: If a government is uncMilized, it cannot expect citizens to obey the law. 3. It highlights a problem:to be cMilized, citizens must conform rather than obey their consciences. 4. It Illustrates a theme; standing by one's conscience is more civilized than simply obeying the majority.

Problemas

from Civil Disobedience After all, the practical reason why, when the power is once in the hands of the people, a majority are permitted and for a long period continue, to rule is not because they are most likely to be in the right, nor because this seems fairest to the minority, but because they are physically the strongest. But a government in which the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice, even as far as men understand It. Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience?-In which majorities decide only those questions to which the rule of expediency is applicable? Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator?Why has every man a conscience, then? I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterward. It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law,so much as for the right. The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think right. Henry Devid Thoreas) What is the effect of the oxymoron "Civil Disobedience"? 1. It describes a principle:civilians must use legal action to disobey the will of the majority. 2. It establishes a tone: If a government is uncMilized, it cannot expect citizens to obey the law. 3. It highlights a problem:to be cMilized, citizens must conform rather than obey their consciences. 4. It Illustrates a theme; standing by one's conscience is more civilized than simply obeying the majority.

from Civil Disobedience After all, the practical reason why, when the power is once in the hands of the people, a majority are permitted and for a long period continue, to rule is not because they are most likely to be in the right, nor because this seems fairest to the minority, but because they are physically the strongest. But a government in which the majority rule in all cases cannot be based on justice, even as far as men understand It. Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience?-In which majorities decide only those questions to which the rule of expediency is applicable? Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator?Why has every man a conscience, then? I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterward. It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law,so much as for the right. The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think right. Henry Devid Thoreas) What is the effect of the oxymoron "Civil Disobedience"? 1. It describes a principle:civilians must use legal action to disobey the will of the majority. 2. It establishes a tone: If a government is uncMilized, it cannot expect citizens to obey the law. 3. It highlights a problem:to be cMilized, citizens must conform rather than obey their consciences. 4. It Illustrates a theme; standing by one's conscience is more civilized than simply obeying the majority.

Solución

avatar
Fernandoexperto · Tutor durante 3 años
expert verifiedVerificación de expertos
4.7 (293 votos)

Responder

4

Explicar

## Step 1<br />The term "Civil Disobedience" is an oxymoron, which is a figure of speech that combines two contradictory terms. In this case, "Civil" and "Disobedience" are the two contradictory terms. <br /><br />## Step 2<br />The term "Civil" refers to the citizens or the people, while "Disobedience" refers to the act of not obeying. Therefore, the term "Civil Disobedience" refers to the act of citizens not obeying the laws or the will of the majority.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The effect of this oxymoron is to illustrate a theme. The theme is that standing by one's conscience is more civilized than simply obeying the majority. This is because the term "Civil Disobedience" suggests that citizens should not blindly obey the laws or the will of the majority, but should instead stand by their own conscience and principles.
Haz clic para calificar: