Pagina de inicio
/
Derecho
/
Part A: How did the 1950 Sweatt v.Painter cases impact the precedent set by the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case? B. The precedent v.Board of Education case. Sweatt v.Painter, the court ruled that the African American student can attend the same law school as the white students. established in the Plessy v Ferguson case remained intact until the 1954 Brown Plessy v.Ferguson, it was determined that "separate but equal" was not Plessy V.Ferguson case.

Problemas

Part A: How did the 1950 Sweatt v.Painter cases impact the precedent set by the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case?
B. The precedent v.Board of Education case.
Sweatt v.Painter, the court ruled that the African American student can attend the same law school as the white students.
established in the Plessy v Ferguson case remained intact until the 1954 Brown
Plessy v.Ferguson, it was determined that "separate but equal" was not Plessy V.Ferguson case.

Part A: How did the 1950 Sweatt v.Painter cases impact the precedent set by the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case? B. The precedent v.Board of Education case. Sweatt v.Painter, the court ruled that the African American student can attend the same law school as the white students. established in the Plessy v Ferguson case remained intact until the 1954 Brown Plessy v.Ferguson, it was determined that "separate but equal" was not Plessy V.Ferguson case.

Solución

avatar
Patriciaprofessionell · Tutor durante 6 años
expert verifiedVerificación de expertos
4.6 (145 votos)

Responder

The Sweatt v. Painter case marked a significant shift in the legal landscape, as it began to dismantle the "separate but equal" doctrine established by the Plessy v. Ferguson case.

Explicar

## Step 1<br />The problem is asking about the impact of the 1950 Sweatt v. Painter case on the precedent set by the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case. The Plessy v. Ferguson case established the "separate but equal" doctrine, which allowed for racial segregation as long as the separate facilities were equal.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The Sweatt v. Painter case challenged this doctrine. The court ruled that the African American student could attend the same law school as the white students, which was a direct contradiction to the "separate but equal" doctrine.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />This case marked a significant shift in the legal landscape, as it began to dismantle the "separate but equal" doctrine established by the Plessy v. Ferguson case.
Haz clic para calificar: