7. Sue, a VITA/TCE coordinator, was watching the local news when she saw Aaron, a new tax law-certified volunteer, in a story about several bank employees being arrested for suspicion of embezzlement. She saw Aaron being led out of the bank in handcuffs Three days later, Sue is shocked when she sees Aaron show up at the site ready to volunteer apparently out on bond She pulls Aaron aside and explains that his arrest on suspicion of embezzlement could have a negative effect on the site and therefore she must ask him to leave the site. Sue removed his access to the software, she then uses the external referral process to report the details to SPEC headquarters by sending an email to ts.voltax@irs gov. Did Sue take appropriate actions as the coordinator? a. Yes b. No

## Step 1<br />The problem presents a situation where Sue, a VITA/TCE coordinator, is faced with a dilemma. She sees Aaron, a new tax law-certified volunteer, being arrested for suspicion of embezzlement. She is concerned about the potential negative impact this could have on the site where they work.<br />## Step 2<br />Sue decides to remove Aaron's access to the software and uses the external referral process to report the situation to SPEC headquarters. She does this by sending an email to ts.voltax@irs.gov.<br />## Step 3<br />The question asks whether Sue took appropriate actions as the coordinator. The options provided are "Yes" and "No".<br />## Step 4<br />Given the context and the actions Sue took, it can be inferred that she did take appropriate actions as the coordinator. She acted in the best interest of the site and followed the proper procedures to report the situation.