Question 1-8 Read the excerpt and answer the question that follows In a unanimous decision the Court held that the Equal Protection Clause required that Sweatt be admitted to the university __ - Sweatt v. Painter "www.oyez.org (accessed November 29, 2017) How did the decision in this 1950 case benefit minorities? By reinforcing the decision in Plessy v. Ferguson By allowing for the creation of religious schools By giving state government the power to create school programs By setting a precedent for Brown v. Board of Education

## Step 1<br />The problem is a comprehension question based on a historical legal case, Sweatt v. Painter, which took place in 1950. The question asks how the decision in this case benefited minorities.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The case of Sweatt v. Painter was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The Court held that the Equal Protection Clause required that Sweatt be admitted to the university. This decision was significant because it set a precedent for the Brown v. Board of Education case.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The decision in Sweatt v. Painter was a significant step towards the desegregation of schools. It set a precedent for the Brown v. Board of Education case, which later declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students to be unconstitutional.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />The decision in Sweatt v. Painter did not reinforce the decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, which upheld racial segregation. It also did not allow for the creation of religious schools or give state government the power to create school programs.