-Edmund S. Morgan, The Birth of the Republic, 1763-89,1956 Which of the following pieces of evidence would best support the author's conclusion? Choose 1 answer: A The grlevances of Danlel Shays and other Revolutionary War veterans due to farm foreclosures B The terms of the Treaty of Paris, which committed US debtors to repaying their British creditors C The decision to replace the Articles of Confederation with a new Constitution D The lack of centralized military power under the Articles of Confederation

To determine which piece of evidence best supports the author's conclusion in Edmund S. Morgan's "The Birth of the Republic, 1763-89," we need to consider the context and arguments presented in the book. The book discusses the early years of the United States and the challenges faced by the new nation.<br /><br />Let's analyze each option:<br /><br />A. The grievances of Daniel Shays and other Revolutionary War veterans due to farm foreclosures: This refers to Shays' Rebellion, which highlighted the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, particularly the lack of a strong central government and the inability to maintain public order.<br /><br />B. The terms of the Treaty of Paris, which committed US debtors to repaying their British creditors: This is related to the financial obligations of the United States following the Revolutionary War, but it does not directly address the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation.<br /><br />C. The decision to replace the Articles of Confederation with a new Constitution: This indicates the recognition of the weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation and the need for a stronger central government, but it does not provide specific evidence of those weaknesses.<br /><br />D. The lack of centralized military power under the Articles of Confederation: This highlights one of the key weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, as it made it difficult for the federal government to maintain order and defend the country.<br /><br />Based on the analysis, the best piece of evidence to support the author's conclusion would be:<br /><br />D. The lack of centralized military power under the Articles of Confederation<br /><br />This option directly addresses a significant weakness of the Articles of Confederation, which is likely the focus of the author's conclusion in the book.