4. What is the name generally given to a judicial decision that is made to advance the interests of one of the political parties? activism review restraint concession All changes saved

## Step 1<br />The question is asking for the term that is generally used to describe a judicial decision that is made to advance the interests of one of the political parties. The options provided are activism, review, restraint, and concession.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The term 'activism' is used to describe a judicial decision that is made to advance the interests of one of the political parties. This is because activism in a legal context often refers to the act of judges making decisions that are intended to bring about social change or to advance the interests of a particular group or political party.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The other options, review, restraint, and concession, do not fit the description given in the question. 'Review' refers to the process of examining a decision or judgment, 'estraint' refers to the act of holding back or controlling, and 'concession' refers to the act of giving in or yielding to something.