20. Under Miranda v. Arizona all accused persons must be Informed of their rights when they are arrested. These rights have become known as "Miranda Rights." A typical reading of someone's Miranda Rights would state: You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.You have the right to have an attorney present during questioning. If you cannot afford an attorney,one will be appointed for you. How did the Warren Court's Miranda decision expand the legal rights of individuals? Suspects became protected against evidence that had been improperly obtained. Suspects would now be protected against self-incrimination upon being arrested. Any arrested suspect would automatically be assigned a court- appointed attorney. People could no longer be an arrested without being told a specific charge for the arrest.

## Step 1<br />The problem is asking us to identify how the Warren Court's Miranda decision expanded the legal rights of individuals. The Miranda decision is a landmark case in the United States, which established the rights of individuals when they are arrested.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The Miranda decision established the rights of individuals to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning. This means that individuals cannot be forced to incriminate themselves during questioning, and they have the right to legal representation.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />Looking at the options provided, we need to identify which one best represents the expansion of legal rights due to the Miranda decision. <br /><br />## Step 4<br />Option B states that "Suspects would now be protected against self-incrimination upon being arrested." This aligns with the rights established by the Miranda decision, which include the right to remain silent and the right to legal representation.