Which of the following describes where secondary succession occurs? An area that has no biogeochemical cycles. An area that was explored used as a cemetery. D An area that has never before been colonized. An area that was disturbed and formerly inhabited.

## Step 1<br />Secondary succession refers to the process of ecological recovery in an area where a disturbance has occurred, but some life and soil remain. This is different from primary succession, which occurs in an area that has never been colonized before.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The options provided in the question are:<br />- An area that has no biogeochemical cycles.<br />- An area that was explored used as a cemetery.<br />- An area that has never before been colonized.<br />- An area that was disturbed and formerly inhabited.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The first option, "An area that has no biogeochemical cycles", does not describe secondary succession because biogeochemical cycles are a natural process that occurs in all ecosystems, not just those that have been disturbed.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />The second option, "An area that was explored used as a cemetery", does not describe secondary succession because it does not necessarily imply that the area was previously inhabited or disturbed.<br /><br />## Step 5<br />The third option, "An area that has never before been colonized", describes primary succession, not secondary succession.<br /><br />## Step 6<br />The fourth option, "An area that was disturbed and formerly inhabited", accurately describes secondary succession. This is because it implies that the area was previously inhabited and has been disturbed, which is the definition of secondary succession.