The two images represent different agricultural land survey patterns. Comparing the two images, which survey system was more efficient in terms of trade? A The river in the long lot survey system provided better access to waterways to transport goods to market. B Trade was inhibited by the metes and bounds system because of physical boundaries between land parcels. C Closely spaced land parcels in the long lot survey system facilitated higher agricultural yields and a more efficient export economy. D The metes and bounds system partitioned land into parcels of one square mile each, ensuring equal access to trade opportunities for each landowner. E The long lot system was less efficient because landowners were in direct competition for

## Step 1<br />The problem involves comparing two different agricultural land survey patterns: the long lot system and the metes and bounds system. The long lot system is characterized by its long, narrow plots that are oriented along a river or other waterway, while the metes and bounds system involves irregularly shaped plots defined by physical features and measurements.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The question asks us to determine which system was more efficient in terms of trade. This involves considering the ease of access to waterways for transportation of goods, the impact of physical boundaries on trade, the effect of land parcel spacing on agricultural yields and trade, and the equal access to trade opportunities in the metes and bounds system.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />Option A suggests that the long lot system provided better access to waterways for transportation of goods, which could enhance trade. This is a valid point, as the long lot system's orientation along a river or waterway would provide easier access to transportation routes.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />Option B suggests that the metes and bounds system was less efficient due to physical boundaries between land parcels. This is also a valid point, as the irregularly shaped plots in the metes and bounds system could create physical barriers to trade.<br /><br />## Step 5<br />Option C suggests that the long lot system's closely spaced land parcels facilitated higher agricultural yields and a more efficient export economy. This is a valid point, as the close proximity of the plots in the long lot system could facilitate easier access to resources and markets.<br /><br />## Step 6<br />Option D suggests that the metes and bounds system partitioned land into parcels of one square mile each, ensuring equal access to trade opportunities for each landowner. This is a valid point, as the equal access to trade opportunities could enhance trade.<br /><br />## Step 7<br />Option E suggests that the long lot system was less efficient because landowners were in direct competition for resources. This is a valid point, as the close proximity of the plots in the long lot system could lead to competition for resources.