Reasoning The US government should fund pre-kindergarten programs i every state in order to set students up for long-term academic success. The Center for Public Education reports that pre-K programs help students "[score] higher on reading and math t in later years compared to children who stay home until kindergarten. Furthermore,,the Pew Charitable Trusts found th "[children] wh, attend high -quality [pre-kindergarten prograr are __ more li Yograduate from high school."By funding th programs, the overnment would help all young Americans reach their academic potential. Remove highlight

## Step 1<br />The problem presents an argument that the US government should fund pre-kindergarten programs in every state to ensure long-term academic success for students. This argument is based on two key points:<br /><br />1. The Center for Public Education reports that pre-K programs help students score higher on reading and math tests in later years compared to children who stay home until kindergarten.<br />2. The Pew Charitable Trusts found that children who attend high-quality pre-kindergarten programs are more likely to graduate from high school.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The argument is structured as a reasoning problem, where the conclusion is that the government should fund these programs. The evidence provided supports this conclusion by showing the positive outcomes of pre-K programs on academic performance and graduation rates.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The argument is based on the assumption that the benefits of pre-K programs are universally applicable and that funding these programs would lead to improved academic outcomes for all students. This is a logical assumption, but it may not hold true in all cases, as the effectiveness of pre-K programs can vary based on a variety of factors, including the quality of the program, the resources available, and the individual child's learning style.