4. What do the critics say could be a nogative result of giving special treatment to student athlotos? A. They say it's necessary for athletes to manage their busy schedules. B. They quote a counselor who says that giving special treatment to athletes makes It seem like sports are more important than school. C. They mention that student athletes usually do better in school when they recolve extra help. D. They provide examples of athletes who have done well in both sports and school without any special privileges.

## Step 1<br />The question is asking for the negative result of giving special treatment to student athletes according to critics. The options provided are different perspectives on this issue.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />Option A suggests that athletes need to manage their busy schedules, which is not a negative result of special treatment.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />Option B quotes a counselor who says that giving special treatment to athletes makes it seem like sports are more important than school. This is a negative result as it implies that the focus of the school is shifting towards sports rather than education.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />Option C mentions that student athletes usually do better in school when they receive extra help. This is not a negative result as it implies that the extra help is beneficial for the athletes.<br /><br />## Step 5<br />Option D provides examples of athletes who have done well in both sports and school without any special privileges. This is not a negative result as it implies that special treatment is not necessary for athletes to perform well.