Imagine that Shelia is writing a persuasive essay.During her research she finds evidence that supports her claim in her thesis. She also finds data that goes contrary to her claim During her writing, she decides not to use the data that reveals a fuller picture about the topic and instead only uses the data that supports her claim. Which type of logical fallacy is described here? Cherry picking Post hoc fallacy Correlation proves causation Reversing causal direction

## Step 1<br />The problem presents a scenario where Shelia is writing a persuasive essay. She finds evidence that supports her claim and also evidence that contradicts her claim. However, she decides to only use the evidence that supports her claim, ignoring the evidence that contradicts it.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />This scenario is an example of a logical fallacy, which is a flaw in reasoning that makes an argument invalid. The specific type of logical fallacy in this case is known as "cherry picking".<br /><br />## Step 3<br />Cherry picking is a type of logical fallacy where only the evidence that supports a particular position is presented, while evidence that contradicts it is ignored. This is exactly what Shelia is doing in the given scenario.