Palmer's actions were unconstitut ional due to their infringem ent on citizens' civil liberties. False True

## Step 1<br />The problem is a statement about the constitutionality of Palmer's actions. The statement is that Palmer's actions were unconstitutional because they infringed on citizens' civil liberties. <br /><br />## Step 2<br />To solve this problem, we need to understand the context of Palmer's actions. Palmer refers to A. Mitchell Palmer, who served as the U.S. Attorney General from 1919 to 1920. He is known for his involvement in the Palmer Raids, a series of raids aimed at capturing, arresting, and deporting radical leftists, particularly anarchists, from the United States.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The constitutionality of Palmer's actions is a matter of legal interpretation. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Ex parte Milligan (1863) that the application of military tribunals to civilians when civilian courts are operational is unconstitutional. This case set a precedent for the protection of civil liberties against government overreach.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />In the context of Palmer's actions, the legality of the Palmer Raids has been a subject of debate among legal scholars. The U.S. Supreme Court later ruled in a series of decisions that the actions taken during the Palmer Raids were unconstitutional. These decisions were based on the grounds that the actions violated the Fifth Amendment's due process clause and the Sixth Amendment's right to a fair trial.<br /><br />## Step 5<br />Therefore, the statement that Palmer's actions were unconstitutional due to their infringement on citizens' civil liberties is true, based on the legal precedents and rulings that followed the Palmer Raids.