A summary of a Supreme Court dissent should include which of the following? A. Logical reasons that support the opinion B. An explanation of judicial review C. Several quotes from the actual case D. Your opinion of the decision

## Step 1<br />A Supreme Court dissent is a statement written by one or more judges expressing disagreement with the majority's decision. The dissenting opinion provides an alternative interpretation of the law and the facts of the case.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />Option A, "Logical reasons that support the opinion," is correct. A dissent should provide logical reasons and arguments to support the dissenting opinion. This is done to show why the dissenting judge(s) disagree with the majority's interpretation and conclusion.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />Option B, "An explanation of judicial review," is not necessarily a requirement for a dissent. While judicial review is a fundamental concept in constitutional law, it is not specific to dissenting opinions. Judicial review refers to the power of the courts to declare acts of the legislative and executive branches unconstitutional. While a dissent might touch upon this concept if it is relevant to the case, it is not a mandatory component of a dissent.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />Option C, "Several quotes from the actual case," is not a requirement for a dissent. While quotes from the case might be used to support the dissenting opinion, they are not a mandatory component. The dissent should focus on the legal reasoning and interpretation, rather than just quoting the case.<br /><br />## Step 5<br />Option D, "Your opinion of the decision," is not a requirement for a dissent. A dissent is not about the personal opinion of the judge but rather a legal argument against the majority's decision. The dissent should be based on legal reasoning and interpretation, not personal feelings or opinions.<br /><br />In conclusion, the correct answer is A, as a dissent should include logical reasons that support the opinion.