Pagina de inicio
/
Derecho
/
The U.S. Supreme Couit dacision in Tinker v. Des Moines supported the - role of the medit in calling attention to civil rights violations right to have a jury of your peers at your trial First Amendment right to express prolests against the Vietnam War government's right to prevent violent protests

Problemas

The U.S. Supreme Couit dacision in Tinker v. Des Moines supported the -
role of the medit in calling attention to civil rights violations
right to have a jury of your peers at your trial
First Amendment right to express prolests against the Vietnam War
government's right to prevent violent protests

The U.S. Supreme Couit dacision in Tinker v. Des Moines supported the - role of the medit in calling attention to civil rights violations right to have a jury of your peers at your trial First Amendment right to express prolests against the Vietnam War government's right to prevent violent protests

Solución

avatar
Danielmaestro · Tutor durante 5 años
expert verifiedVerificación de expertos
4.3 (159 votos)

Responder

The U.S. Supreme Court decision in Tinker v. Des Moines supported the First Amendment right to express protests against the Vietnam War.

Explicar

## Step 1<br />The problem is about the U.S. Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines. This case is a landmark decision in the realm of First Amendment rights, specifically the right to freedom of speech in public schools.<br />## Step 2<br />The case arose when a group of students decided to wear black armbands to protest the Vietnam War. The school authorities, foreseeing potential disruption, suspended the students for violating the school's policy against wearing armbands.<br />## Step 3<br />The students, represented by their parents, took the case to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the students, stating that the First Amendment rights of students in public schools are not limited to the school premises but extend to off-campus activities as well.<br />## Step 4<br />The Supreme Court's decision in this case supports the First Amendment right to express protests against the Vietnam War. This is because the students' peaceful protest was a form of expression protected by the First Amendment.
Haz clic para calificar: