Questien 11 (5 points) Looking between two bite mark impressions, which conclusion would investigators categorize if the canines of the upper jaw of the bite mark found on the victim was 3.4 cm apart while the lower jaw's canines were 3.2 cm apart. The suspect's canines were also the same width apart according to dental records The incisors of the suspect had a slight overlap of the upper Jaw's central incisors, while the bite mark on the victim was too decomposed to get a clear impression of the incisors. Possible ID b Positive ID Exclusion d Insufficient Evidence

## Step 1<br />The problem involves comparing two bite mark impressions. The measurements of the canines in the upper and lower jaws of the victim are given, as well as the suspect's dental records. The incisors of the suspect have a slight overlap, while the bite mark on the victim is too decomposed to provide a clear impression of the incisors.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The canines of the upper jaw of the bite mark found on the victim are 3.4 cm apart, while the lower jaw's canines are 3.2 cm apart. The suspect's canines, according to dental records, are the same width apart.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The incisors of the suspect have a slight overlap of the upper Jaw's central incisors, while the bite mark on the victim is too decomposed to provide a clear impression of the incisors.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />Given these details, the investigators would categorize the conclusion as "Exclusion". This is because the measurements of the canines are the same for both the victim and the suspect, but the incisors do not match due to the decomposition of the victim's bite mark.