Alexander Hamilton's argument that the government has the power to create a National Bank is based on which part of the Constitution? The Necessary and Proper Clause because it specifically denies the states from establishing state banks The Supremacy Clause because it prevents D the states from making financial decisions for the entire nation The Necessary and Proper Clause because it grants the government implied powers to expand beyond the written Constitution to fulfill the duties of the government The Supremacy Clause because it grants the government : the power to oversee

## Step 1<br />The question is asking us to identify the part of the U.S. Constitution that Alexander Hamilton used to justify the creation of a National Bank. <br /><br />## Step 2<br />Hamilton's argument was based on the Necessary and Proper Clause, also known as the Elastic Clause, which is found in Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution. This clause grants Congress the power to pass all laws necessary and proper for carrying out the enumerated list of powers.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />Hamilton's interpretation of this clause was that it allowed for the creation of a National Bank, even though the Constitution did not explicitly mention such a bank. He argued that the bank was necessary and proper for the government to carry out its duties, such as managing the country's finances and regulating commerce.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />The other options provided in the question are incorrect. The Supremacy Clause, found in Article VI of the Constitution, establishes that federal laws are the "supreme law of the land," overriding state laws. It does not grant the government the power to create a National Bank.