1)) Read the claim below. 4) The government should not use taxpayers'money to fund the arts. 4)) Select the piece of evidence that best supports this claim. Private citizens , corporations, and foundations already spend billions of dollars each year to support the arts. The largest government arts program costs.the average taxpayer only about forty-five cents per year. The Federal Art Project was a government-funded program that employed thousands of artists during the Great Depression.

## Step 1<br />The problem presents a claim that the government should not use taxpayers' money to fund the arts. The task is to select the piece of evidence that best supports this claim.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The first piece of evidence states that private citizens, corporations, and foundations already spend billions of dollars each year to support the arts. This evidence suggests that there is already a significant amount of private funding for the arts, which could be interpreted as a reason why the government should not need to fund the arts.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The second piece of evidence states that the largest government arts program costs the average taxpayer only about forty-five cents per year. This evidence suggests that the cost of government-funded arts programs is minimal for the average taxpayer, which could be interpreted as a reason why the government should fund the arts.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />The third piece of evidence states that the Federal Art Project was a government-funded program that employed thousands of artists during the Great Depression. This evidence suggests that government-funded arts programs can provide employment opportunities, which could be interpreted as a reason why the government should fund the arts.<br /><br />## Step 5<br />Based on the analysis of the evidence, the first piece of evidence best supports the claim that the government should not use taxpayers' money to fund the arts. This is because it suggests that there is already a significant amount of private funding for the arts, which could be interpreted as a reason why the government should not need to fund the arts.