Opposing Argument Hotel owners argue that few travelers want to bring along pets, so accommodating animals isn't worth the trouble. These owners don't see any benefit to opening their hotels to pets when it wouldn't attract more customers. Answer enu-Click to add. How er, significant numbers of vacationers actually do want to bring along their urry friends. In a 2017 TripAdvisor survey, over half of res indents reported they travel with their pets and specifically seek out pet-friendly hotels. However, significant numbers of vacationers actually do want to bring along their furry friends After all, wouldn't you want to bring an adorable, happy pet along with you on trips?

## Step 1<br />The problem presents a scenario where hotel owners argue that few travelers want to bring along pets, hence, accommodating animals isn't worth the trouble. This argument is based on the assumption that accommodating pets would not attract more customers.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The opposing argument is presented, which states that significant numbers of vacationers actually do want to bring along their pets. This is supported by a 2017 TripAdvisor survey, which found that over half of respondents reported they travel with their pets and specifically seek out pet-friendly hotels.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />The question asks for an additional argument that supports the opposing argument. The answer provided is: "After all, wouldn't you want to bring an adorable, happy pet along with you on trips?" This argument is based on the assumption that people would want to bring their pets along on trips because they are adorable and happy.