36 This the patient Protection and Affordablescribes some effect 2010. 1. Americans gained increased there for purchasing private health insurance outside the workplace. 2. Some employer insurance plan prices increased slightly but only temporarily. 3. Americans could receive government subsidies to help pay for the cost of health insurance. 4. Coverse limits, or maximum amounts that insurance companies would pay for medical treatment during a person's lifetime,ended. Which effect would LIKELY be opposed by a person who believes the the national debt is too high? A 1 B 2 C 3 D 4

## Step 1<br />The problem is asking us to identify which effect of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), also known as Obamacare, would likely be opposed by a person who believes the national debt is too high. The PPACA is a healthcare reform law that was enacted in 2010.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The options provided are:<br />1. Americans gained increased terms for purchasing private health insurance outside the workplace.<br />2. Health insurance outside the insurance plan prices increased slightly but only temporarily.<br />3. Americans could receive government subsidies to help pay for the cost of health insurance.<br />4. Coverage limits, or maximum amounts that insurance companies would pay for medical treatment during a person's lifetime, ended.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />We need to consider which of these effects would likely be opposed by a person who believes the national debt is too high. This person would likely oppose any effect that increases government spending or debt.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />Looking at the options, option 3 states that Americans could receive government subsidies to help pay for the cost of health insurance. This would increase government spending and thus, the national debt. Therefore, a person who believes the national debt is too high would likely oppose this effect.