Federalism gives rise to tensions between the federal and state governments. Which of the follow accurately describes how federal-state tensions recently have been resolved by the Supreme Co Select an Answer A. The Supreme Court has consistently ruled in favor of federal supremacy on matters of health care immigration, and marijuana policy. B. The Supreme Court has consistently ruled in favor of state governments' supremacy on matters of health care, immigration and marijuana policy due to Tenth Amendment. C. The Supreme Court has generally avoided ruling on cases involving immigration health care, and marijuana citing that the issues are political in nature. D. While the Supreme Court has generally sided with the national government over matters where the national government has preempted state policies, there have been notable examples where the Court ruled in favor of states' rights,such as health care.

## Step 1<br />The problem is asking us to identify the correct statement that accurately describes how federal-state tensions have recently been resolved by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States and plays a crucial role in interpreting the Constitution and resolving disputes between the federal and state governments.<br /><br />## Step 2<br />The Supreme Court has a history of ruling in favor of federal supremacy, particularly in matters of health care, immigration, and marijuana policy. This is because the federal government has the power to regulate these areas under the Commerce Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause of the Constitution.<br /><br />## Step 3<br />However, there have also been instances where the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of states' rights. This is particularly true in cases where the federal government has overstepped its bounds or where the states have a strong argument for their position.<br /><br />## Step 4<br />Therefore, the correct answer is D. While the Supreme Court has generally sided with the national government over matters where the national government has preempted state policies, there have been notable examples where the Court ruled in favor of states' rights, such as health care.