Pagina de inicio
/
Derecho
/
tion 1-27 excerpt below to answer the question lestion in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the lat Congress has a right to prevent tenck v. United States 1918 statement best explains the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in this case? he 1st Amendment was created to protect political speech. Ispeech discussing unpopular topics could be restricted The government could limit speech during times of war The 14th Amendment was created to protect federal power.

Problemas

tion 1-27
excerpt below to answer the question
lestion in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such
a nature as to create a
clear and present danger that they will bring about the
lat Congress has a right to prevent
tenck v. United States 1918
statement best explains the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in this case?
he 1st Amendment was created to protect political speech.
Ispeech discussing unpopular topics could be restricted
The government could limit speech during times of war
The 14th Amendment was created to protect federal power.

tion 1-27 excerpt below to answer the question lestion in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the lat Congress has a right to prevent tenck v. United States 1918 statement best explains the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in this case? he 1st Amendment was created to protect political speech. Ispeech discussing unpopular topics could be restricted The government could limit speech during times of war The 14th Amendment was created to protect federal power.

Solución

avatar
Carlosveterano · Tutor durante 9 años
expert verifiedVerificación de expertos
3.8 (374 votos)

Responder

The statement that best explains the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in this case is: "Speech discussing unpopular topics could be restricted."<br /><br />In the case of Schenck v. United States (1918), the Supreme Court upheld the Espionage Act of 1917, which made it a crime to interfere with the war effort or promote insubordination in the military. The Court ruled that the government could restrict speech if it posed a "clear and present danger" to the nation's security or war effort. This decision established the "clear and present danger" test, which allowed the government to limit speech if it could lead to significant harm or danger.
Haz clic para calificar: